Plain links, no badges. These point to the original research and to reputable, consumer-facing health references. If you are a clinician, Kegelia for clinicians covers how it can sit alongside care.
Pelvic floor muscle training vs. no treatment for urinary incontinence in women Dumoulin C, et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018 (CD005654)Systematic review · 31 trials, 1,817 women · Follow-up generally under 12 months
PubMed → Assessment of Kegel performance after brief verbal instruction Bump RC, et al. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1991Cross-sectional study · 47 women
PubMed → Pelvic floor awareness and verbal instructions in 958 women early post-delivery International Urogynecology Journal, 2014Cohort study · 958 women early post-delivery
Springer → Conservative management for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence Anderson CA, et al. Cochrane, 2015 (CD001843) · later split; the management half is Johnson EE, et al. Cochrane, 2023 (CD014799)Systematic review · 50 trials, 4,717 men · Value of conservative management remains uncertain
PMC → Postural and respiratory functions of the pelvic floor muscles Hodges PW, Sapsford R, et al. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 2007Cross-sectional study
Wiley → Kegel Exercises: clinical overview StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf
NCBI → Kegel exercises: how-to references Mayo Clinic (women's & men's) · NIDDK, National Institutes of HealthConsumer health reference · Less helpful for heavy leaking and overflow incontinence
Mayo (women) → Mayo (men) → NIDDK → Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women Woodley SJ, et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020 (CD007471)Systematic review · 46 trials, 10,832 women · Effect as a treatment in pregnancy and postpartum remains uncertain
PubMed → Prevalence, incidence and bothersomeness of urinary incontinence in pregnancy Moossdorff-Steinhauser HFA, et al. International Urogynecology Journal, 2021Systematic review · 44 studies, 88,305 women · Substantial clinical heterogeneity between studies
PubMed → Exercise in pregnancy NHSConsumer health reference
NHS → Exercise during pregnancy American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, FAQ119Consumer health reference
ACOG → Returning to running postnatal – guidelines for medical, health and fitness professionals managing this population Goom T, Donnelly G, Brockwell E. 2019 (consensus guideline, expert opinion)Clinical guideline · No national or international guidelines exist; the running timeline is Level 4 evidence, the pelvic floor recommendation Level 1+
Guideline → Pelvic Floor Morbidity Following Vaginal Delivery versus Cesarean Delivery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Barca JA, et al. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2021 (13 studies, 1,597,303 participants)Systematic review · 5,411 patients for urinary incontinence, 6,019 for prolapse · Cannot distinguish elective from emergency cesarean
PMC → Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period ACOG Committee Opinion No. 804, April 2020 (reaffirmed 2023) · Obstetrics & Gynecology 2020;135:e178-88Clinical guideline
ACOG → The efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis Li C, Gong Y, Wang B. International Urogynecology Journal, 2016Systematic review · 13 studies, 2,340 patients · Inconclusive as an adjunct to prolapse surgery
PubMed → Conservative prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse in women Hagen S, Stark D. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011 (CD003882)Systematic review · 6 trials; 857 women in the training versus control comparison · Small trials, results could not be pooled
PubMed → Pelvic floor muscle training as treatment for female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Jorge CH, Bø K, et al. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2024Systematic review · 21 trials reviewed, 4 in the meta-analysis · Very low certainty of evidence (GRADE)
PubMed → Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, NG123Clinical guideline
NICE → Incontinence after Prostate Treatment American Urological Association / GURS / SUFU guideline, 2019 (amended 2024)Clinical guideline · Moderate certainty of evidence (Grade B)
AUA → Group-Based vs Individual Pelvic Floor Muscle Training to Treat Urinary Incontinence in Older Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial Dumoulin C, et al. JAMA Internal Medicine, 2020;180(10):1284-1293Randomised trial · 362 women aged 60 and over · May not generalize to frail older or younger women
PubMed → Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause Shifren JL. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018;61(3):508-516Clinical overview
PubMed → Recognition and management of nonrelaxing pelvic floor dysfunction Faubion SS, Shuster LT, Bharucha AE. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2012;87(2):187-193Clinical overview · Evidence for manual therapy comes mostly from case series
PMC → Menopause: identification and management National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, NG23Clinical guideline
NICE → The 2020 genitourinary syndrome of menopause position statement of The North American Menopause Society The North American Menopause Society. Menopause, 2020;27(9):976-992Clinical guideline · A position statement, not a graded guideline
PubMed → Urinary incontinence National Health Service (NHS)Consumer health reference
NHS → Diagnosis and Management of Male Chronic Pelvic Pain American Urological Association guideline, 2025Clinical guideline · Pelvic floor statements are Grade C or Expert Opinion
AUA → Erectile Dysfunction American Urological Association guideline, 2018Clinical guideline
AUA → Feedback or biofeedback to augment pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women Herderschee R, Hay-Smith EJ, et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011 (CD009252)Systematic review · 24 trials, 1,583 women · Superseded by the 2025 Cochrane update below
PubMed → 10 ways to stop leaks National Health Service (NHS)Consumer health reference
NHS → Pelvic floor muscle training improves erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation: a systematic review Myers C, Smith M. Physiotherapy, 2019;105(2):235-243Systematic review · 10 trials · Included studies of low to moderate methodological quality
PubMed → Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training in the management of premature ejaculation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials de Oliveira FA, et al. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2026Systematic review · 5 studies, 236 men · High heterogeneity in the training subgroup (I² = 75%)
PubMed → Symptoms & Causes of Erectile Dysfunction National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), reviewed 2024Consumer health reference
NIDDK → Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy for Pelvic Floor Hypertonicity: A Systematic Review of Treatment Efficacy van Reijn-Baggen DA, et al. Sexual Medicine Reviews, 2022;10(2):209-230Systematic review · 10 studies · Most studies at high risk of bias
PubMed → Evidence for increased tone or overactivity of pelvic floor muscles in pelvic health conditions: a systematic review Worman RS, Stafford RE, Cowley D, Prudencio CB, Hodges PW. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2023;228(6):657-674.e91Systematic review · 151 studies · Few studies provide convincing evidence
PubMed → Disorders of Ejaculation: An AUA/SMSNA Guideline American Urological Association / Sexual Medicine Society of North America, 2020Clinical guideline
AUA → Pelvic floor muscle training with feedback or biofeedback for urinary incontinence in women Fernandes ACN, Jorge CH, Weatherall M, et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2025, Issue 3 (CD009252)Systematic review · 41 studies, 3,483 women · Update of the 2011 review: adding biofeedback to training probably makes little or no difference to cure or improvement
Cochrane → Comparisons of approaches to pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women Hay-Smith EJC, Starzec-Proserpio M, et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2024, Issue 12 (CD009508)Systematic review · Clinic vs e-health supervision: 1 trial, 173 women, very low certainty
Cochrane → Kegelia supports pelvic floor strength and recovery. It is not a medical device and does not diagnose, treat, or cure any condition. This page is general information, not medical advice. For anything specific to your body, talk to a clinician. References are provided as sources; the organizations listed do not endorse Kegelia.